Visit Superuser.com.au
Superuser Learning Center
superuser.com.au

August 20, 2008

Alexander Hayes

Transgressional Change Agents & Vomit Hive Minds

……and it’s 11pm and we are about to launch off into a TalkingVTE number….13.

The topic is using technologies in an educational context - Phone A Friend.

Meanwhile someone’s vomiting and another is hive minding the links.

What makes business tick ?

Seems anything that’s linked to Identica.

Chris backs up the transgressional change agency motivation. It’s radical ….lets let the network in ….connections matter.

Especially in reformed Presbyterian miniskirt some say;

Quote:

…… all for challenging the impervious of ” to give to all who work here the true love of knowledge which makes all study a discovery and a joy “….

Judy O'Connell

heyjude


Righto…lets see if a jpg works differently on Posterous, compared to a tga file!  Why did I choose a tga file?  Silly chicky - that’s a file good for Second Life..not for blogs :-)

Posted by email from Heyjude’s posterous

heyjude


Naturally, I am now testing the other bits of fun associated with Posterous.   Well, I am using my Gmail account, because my work email sends to Posterous all the privacy stuff that we have at the bottom of our emails. Now, to test sending a pic along with the post.

Here's a pic from my phone.  Oh, and we can't send stuff via SMS from OZ yet…unless we dial to the UK.  Sometimes, just sometimes, it might be worth it.  Otherwise via email is pretty cool.

So this is crossposting to my blog, twitter, and of course to Posterous. Nice  :-)

Click here to download:

River.tga (768 KB)

Posted by email from Heyjude’s posterous

heyjude


I’ve just set up a posterous account via email, and it totally blew me away. This is the quickest thing on earth to set up and get kids blogging. It’s the quickest thing on earth for cross posting. Well, I just like it …it’s fun.

What’s more you can attach any type of file and they’ll post it along with the text of your email.
They’ll do smarter things for photos, MP3’s, documents and video links

I’m off to test this with an email right now!!  Cool.  Thanks to Maureen for sending me a recommendation :-)

Posted by email from Heyjude’s posterous

Graham Wegner

Notes From Mal Lee Session @ National IWB Conference

Although, like Lauren O’Grady, I felt a bit underwhelmed at the sessions at the National IWB Conference, one leadership session that I found very valuable was held by Mal Lee, Digital Schooling Consultant and creator of IWB.net. Here are my notes from the session with my thoughts in italics.

Author of a book “leading a digital school” which was due out this week. Mal was also involved in the 2003 research into IWB’s at Richardson Primary School, Canberra, ACT. His talk was about achieving total teacher usage of digital instructional technology - preferring the term DIT to ICT. (Not sure if I like the term instructional - has a lot of connotations about methodologies being used. Where’s learning?)

It doesn’t matter if the technology is there if it is not used. The paper based mode has been maximised (Treadwell says that it peaked in the mid-60’s) and it is time to move to a new paradigm. This move should also enhance the prductivity of the nation. In developed nations, the majority of teachers use technology for preparation but only a small number use technology for instruction. Singapore, Korea, UK and NZ have significant investments in this area but Australia hasn’t done so - now there is a big divide between the home and classroom, and between the proactive and the reactive teachers. The onus is on schools to address the human and technology variables simultaneously, not one then the other.

The Variables.

1. Teacher Acceptance. This is anyone who teaches in your school as the teacher is the most powerful person in the education equation when it comes to technology. In NSW, all secondary kids will have a laptop under the DER scheme (they don’t get a choice, and it will be an el-cheapo) but whether they get used will be decided by the teacher in the classroom. So, they need to see the educational value and how it assists their teaching.

2. Working with the givens. We teach classes, not individuals, have to manage that class operating in classrooms with physical limits, a crowded curriculum that limits the time to go off elsewhere like a computing room - so the tools need to be in the classroom.

3. Teacher training & teacher development support. Teacher release within the school is the most valuable, give them time to do things. Amazing statistic - 64% of UK classrooms have an IWB, Australia has got 5%.

4. Nature and availability of the technology. Needs to assist teaching, not oblige change, integrate with teaching. IWB’s were designed by companies started by ex-teachers while most ICT tools were designed for other purposes. Not a fan of laptops in schools because of the high tech support needed, one private laptop school now wants to get rid of them - the future will probably be some iteration of the iPhone.

5. Teacher acceptance of IWB’s. (Can IWB’s change pedagogy or just entrench it?) The important feature of the IWB is it is a digital facilitator (not the native software) and now there are early signs that key areas (IWB + broadband) can improve literacy - quoted Balanskat 2006 (can’t find link via Google). IWB numbers have grown from 70,000 in 2002 up to 603,000 in 2008 with predicted numbers reaching 1.371 million by 2012.

6. Appropriate content and software. 85% of Australian schools are severely restricted by filters, and that means less access to Web 2.0 tools.

7. Infrastructure. The best bandwidth available is what’s needed - Korean speeds in schools are around 100MB while Australia does well to get 1.5MB. Technology needs to be operative 100% of teaching time even though education has unusual demands - peaks between 9 - 3, 5 days a week.

8. Finance. Successful schools have leaders who go out and find the money. Must consider Total Cost of Ownership which includes teacher PD but schools are still funded on a paper based model. The average school budget commits 2.7% to ICT but 85% to staffing. If schools have a chance they must capitalise on the DER funding.

9. Leadership. This is crucial in order to unlock time, money, to put pressure on certain people and overcome hurdles. Australian preparation of principals is not geared towards this future - but they are the architects of the digital school.

10. Implementation. It is a historic pattern that we are focussed on equipment, but department restrictions can be a problem. Eventually schools that have their act together won’t want to play by their department’s rules.

Mal says that he disagrees with Peter Kent’s eTeaching pedagogy, just believes in good teaching. He believes that we have reached a decline in teacher preparation time thanks to technology (or has it just shifted that preparation?) He doesn’t care what brand of IWB schools buy - that will depend on the user.

Overall, an interesting session that allowed me to compare his advice with my own school’s journey. I don’t think I agree with him about the potential of laptops in the classroom but much of what he said made sense to me.


Authored by Graham. Hosted by Edublogs.

Judy O'Connell

heyjude


People beyond Australia will be interested to catch the news item “Phone a friend in exams”.

A SYDNEY girls’ school is redefining the concept of cheating by allowing students to “phone a friend” and use the internet and i-Pods during exams. Presbyterian Ladies’ College at Croydon is giving the assessment method a trial run with year 9 English students and plans to expand it to all subjects by the end of the year.

This is part of a pilot study to examine potential change in the ways in which the Higher School Certificate (HSC  is the final pulic examination for all students in New South Wales) might be run.

Awesome! Read more about it from Chris in The Truth is Out There

Photo: Question Mark

KerryJ’s Neotenous Tech

Howard Rheingold’s Co-laboratory

The theory of digital natives (those younger than 30 being perfectly at ease with and heavy users of technology) is busted as far as Howard Rheingold is concerned — and he’s doing something about it. A social networking and online communications educator since the 1980s, Howard Rheingold found that when he suggested the use of blogs, [...]

Kerrie Smith

We should be doing a lot better

Julia Gillard’s special address to participants in the recent ACER Research conference should be compulsory listening for all involved in school education, whether in a school or at a higher administrative level.

Some snippets:

  • For over a decade, debates about knowledge and skills in Australia have been based on the opposite of evidence – prejudice.
  • Figures from the most recent OECD Education at a Glance show a strong correlation between school completion and higher per capita GDP.
  • there is evidence of slippage in our performance [in education] at a time when we know standing still is equal to falling behind.
  • Australia currently ranks 23rd out of 35 OECD countries for finishing Year-12 or a Certificate III qualification.
  • As a nation, we should be tracking attainment, knowing that we are in the powerful position of comparing like schools with like schools. If two schools have comparable school populations but widely varying results we would be able to ask the question why and ascertain the answer.
  • we should be identifying excellent teaching and excellent school leadership.
  • We must expect high standards for every child.
  • ‘Dumbing down’ is unacceptable.
  • estimated that the failure of young people to make a smooth transition to the world of work is costing our economy some $1.3 billion per year.
  • there are 5 million working age Australians without a qualification at the certificate III level or above

Whether you agree with what she is saying or not, there is certainly some food for discussion.
You can listen to Ms Gillard’s speech here and the text of her speech is available on the DEWR Media Centre.

And then combine that with the Technology Integration Matrix and ask yourself how enabling you, or your school, is.
The matrix plots “characteristics of the learning environment” against “Levels of Technology integration into the Curriculum”.

On the matrix, at the highest level, “transformation” means

  • The teacher creates a rich learning environment in which students regularly engage in activities that would have been impossible to achieve without technology.
  • Given ongoing access to online resources, students actively select and pursue topics beyond the limitations of even the best school library.
  • Technology enables students to collaborate with peers and experts irrespective of time
    zone or physical distances.
  • Students use technology to construct, share, and publish knowledge to a worldwide
    audience.
  • By means of technology tools, students participate in outside-of-school projects and problem-solving activities that have meaning for the students and the community.
  • Students engage in ongoing metacognitive activities at a level that would be unattainable without the support of technology tools.

How do your teachers, your school, measure up?

August 19, 2008

Chris Harvey

UK government blunder

The UK government have been running their new website on Wordpress, they seem very keen on being viewed as supporters of open source software. However it would appear that they have using the Networker theme and apparently removed all traces of the theme’s source, author attribution and licencing from its website source code. The Networker theme, which is available at antbag.com, was created by Anthony Baggett and is licenced under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License.

So it appears that they have removed the attribution notice that was in the original footer, and have broken the license conditions, and are therefore in breach of copyright. Thanks to The Open Sourcerer who brought this to the attention of the British public. Suggestions that the government may have paid £100k for a ripped off theme which runs on an Open Source blogging engine really does worry me on a number of levels!

Photo credit: Hightech.Blogosfere

creative-commons-350.gif

Stephen Downes

NIH - No Irvings Here

Responding to Tom Young.

When I visited Saint John a year or two ago I was staying down near the convention centre and the mall downtown. I walked along the public path around the inner harbour, and it was very nice.

Then I decided I wanted to see the waterfront out on the Bay of Fundy itself, not just on the river. I walked all through Saint John looking for that waterfront, but all I saw was run-down housing and industries. The main part of Saint John is completely blocked from the sea!

If you were to design a coastal city, you couldn't do it worse. How do you take the city's most prime real estate, that should be a pleasure to live in, and completely block it from the sea?

It reminded me of the day before, when I went to see the Reversing Falls. The falls were there all right - but somebody had built a big factory (it looked like a power plant) right on top of them!

You see - the problem isn't just this one project, and it isn't just this one bit of harbourfront. It's that Saint John has been so badly treated by industry over the years - including, especially, Irving, which routinely gets breaks from the City government.

Now there's nothing left for people. Every last bit of real estate is taken by companies, like Irving, that seem to have a lock on city council.

Before I moved to New Brunswick 8 years ago I thought Saint John would be a nice place to live. But now I realize that we have more ocean front here in Moncton than they do in Saint John.

I think we should have a campaign here, targeted toward the poor people in Saint John who can't ever see the sea behind the factory fences:

NIH - "No Irvings Here"

Not strictly true, of course, as our laughingstock of a newspaper proves to us every day. But at least we use the best and most scenic land in our city for parks and recreation, not Irving offices.

And at least it looks like our Council - realizing that it must serve the interests of the city population and the other businesses in the city - has managed to learn not to cave every time an Irving asks them for a handout.

Our Councils (Moncton, Riverview, Dieppe) - despite the loud wails of protest from the Irving newspaper - spend money on parks, nice roads, bicycle paths, bridges, schools, swimming pools, and the rest. Come here to Moncton and you see a modern city with clean streets and buildings in good repair.

In Saint John, where the Irvings hold such sway, exactly the opposite is the case. After giving huge breaks to the Irvings, and browbeaten into keeping taxes low for the rest, the city of Saint John looks like it could not afford a dog-catcher, much less a public infrastructure program.

In your column you ask us to imagine that some other company was thinking of that land. Well it wouldn't happen! You can't set up shop in Saint John unless you're partnering with Irving - because if you aren't, you won't get any breaks from Council. And if you partner with Irving you understand that Irving is the top dog. Any breaks you get, you get through Irving. Period.

Tom, I am not opposed to industry and commerce, and I would normally support the efforts of a large company to locate in the city. But the Irvings have used an essential monopoly on commerce in the city - and media in the city - to create a system that enriches themselves while impoverishing everyone else.

We have managed very well in Moncton without the presence of Irving head offices or Irving refineries (especially once we finally got rid of that polluted eyesore the Irvings left on our riverfront). We have a diverse commercial and industrial base, with city government taking into account the needs of all citizens, not a privileged few.

The problem isn't the presence of industry and commerce - it's the special deals the Irvings manage to get as a result of their comfy relationship with government and stranglehold over media, a special relationship that favour them but drives out all other industry (all other competition!) in the city.

Judy O'Connell

heyjude


The winners of the Children’s Book Council of Australia Book Week shortlist have been announced.  School and school libraries in Australia are very busy celebrating good books and good reading.

more about “fym “, posted with vodpod

Dean Groom

dskmag


A quick snapshot of the sandbox in Skoolaborate where kids are working in their TeenSecondClassroom project. A 2 minute Shakespeare play that they are going to post onto Machinima.com in a few weeks. It’s great to see how they are approaching this. Some building film like sets and other who have been looking at more traditional stages. They are just beginning to consider textures … I just wish we had more than an hour a week, but at least it is in the timetable!

Kerrie Smith

What should learning look like?

Have you seen the thought provoking Pearson Foundation video called Learning to Change. Changing to Learn. made at this year’s CosN conference?

This veritable who’s who of educational thinkers (Keith Kruger, Greg Whitby, Greg Black, Julie Evans, Stephen Heppell, Yong Zhao, Barbara Nelson, Cheryl Lemke, Susan Patrick, Chris Dede, Karen Greenwood Henke, Deborah Baker, Daniel Pink, and Ken Kay) are all asking what learning in the 21st century should look like.

Can you guess the answers to these questions?

  • which industry sector was ranked the lowest in IT intensity by the US Department of Commerce?
  • which industry still uses 19th century methodology?
  • which is richer for education? schools or the outside environment?

Julie Evans says kids are big communicators but we disempower them when we make them turn off their devices as they walk through our doors.

Greg Whitby says its all about relationships, community, connectivity, and access.

Stephen Heppell says children are living in an interesting space: “the nearly now”.

As Digital Chalkie commented: These international educators recognise the need to shift our thinking at all levels by being innovative, thinking creatively and developing 21st century pedagogies that will inspire this generation of learners.

Watch the video for yourself:


Leigh Blackall

leighblackall


I spoke at the Distance Education Association of New Zealand (DEANZ) 2008 Conference yesterday.

Educational Development at Otago Polytechnic.

An inverted IP policy, intensive use of social media, and prolific development of Open Educational Resources and practices

Here’s the:

  1. audio recording
  2. the slides
  3. the paper

Bill Kerr

Greer's problem

Marcia Langton has comprehensively refuted Germaine Greer analysis that aboriginal men are perpetual and hopeless victims of rage in a magnificent essay (Greer maintains rage of racists)

What is Greer's problem?
  • recycling slogans from the past that are partially true but one sided, a one sided slogan based view of history, taking partial truths and presenting them as essential truths
  • sloppy psychological based analysis, fitting the world to her view, not seeking the truth rigorously, not listening to those who know better, not being objective
  • She uses her ideology as a blinker, not a filter. We all have ideologies but need some way to keep them in touch with objectivity
  • lofty and grandiose pronouncement from afar, not really being on the ground or in touch or up to date with the real, current indigenous problems
  • a comfortable victim hood view of the world, victims can't get over it: "Trust me I've been a victim and know what you are suffering"
Earlier on Pamela Bone exposed Greer for her lack of solidarity with oppressed Muslim women. The dialectical wheel has turned full circle: Greer from liberator of women to oppressor of women.

These are real problems which I believe can be extended to other contentious issues such as the Iraq war (Iraq is now finally emerging as a democratic state) and the alleged environmental catastrophe. It's easy to fall back on long held beliefs that add together to become a world outlook, it's easy to avoid the hard yards of rigorous analysis, it's easy to be a comfortable victim of forces so powerful they are hard to deal with, it's easy to seek attention with short blog posts like this that ride off the hard work of others. It's hard to be objective, really hard.

In this case, it's clear to me that Marcia Langton has done the hard yards and Germaine Greer has not. Read her essay.

August 18, 2008

Stephen Downes

How Far Did You Roam As A Child?

John Larkin links to Bill Kerr along with an article in the Guardian, Kids need the adventure of risky play and an article in the Mail online, How children lost the right to roam in four generations.

The premise is that children today have lost their right to roam, and that this sort of protective attitude is harming them.

Maybe. I ranged far and wide as a child: below is a map of the places I visited on my bicycle between the ages 10-14:



After I was 14, I got a part time job in Ottawa, and my attention was focused on the city. Between the ages of 14 and 16 I wandered in and out of the city pretty much at will, and my range included the entire city. At 16 I got a motocycle, which gave me a range of about 300 miles in diameter. I also traveled to Britain with a school group (which I ditched once we hit London, giving me that entire city to roam).

Update

Here is my range at age 78, in Candiac, on the south shore of Montreal.

Dean Groom

dskmag


How do you ‘mark’ blogging, wikis etc.,? - A question I am getting a lot right now. My EdTech professional development programme for staff is actually based around the notion that ‘digital literacy’ is in fact just literacy.

In order to show teachers how go about developing online learning communities, I am running a sequence of sessions with staff to model how to rethink how they use and embed ICT into their ‘normal’ classroom activities. I firmly believe that this is the only way to get greater acceptance of it’s importance and greater use in the classroom.

Heres how it works. Firstly, I base the initial stages firmly in literacy. It starts with setting up a learning community, discussion of what should be ‘normal’ ICT based activities - selecting the appropriate central mechanism for this - and sending home permission notes to parents.

I then model how to use it as reflective practice. I don’t think that ‘tool use’ is effective, and serves to silo activities, so the learning community extends out into ‘digital story telling’.

To me this is the act of ’showing’ - it is the application of ‘content’ into higher order activities. I ask teachers to use 3 tools to do this - that best suits the age/skill of the learners and the time they have in ICT rooms.

We have to begin all this with the end firmly in mind. So by selecting 3, I can them model how to use just about any Web2.0, MUVE, gaming type scenario into a classroom. Each time, we are looking for the same key performance indicators. I have identified 8 ‘digital story telling’ tools, each based on the idea of developing ePortfolios and digital reputation.

Finally, we use the existing standards/outcomes. This means that the reflective writing process and the story telling is geared to meet the outcomes. Teachers seem to find it really hard to relate how Web2.0 information processes map to standards and outcomes.

You can see that this is a big spreadsheet! - Given the last 4 columns are really what we used to report on. In Australia we use A to E reporting. This rubric is flexible to allow teachers to apply definitions to the A to E, but still gives them a scaffold and rubric to deliver it.

The key PD skill in all this is not ‘tool’ focused at all. In fact I don’t teach ‘tools’ to teachers. What is important is the reflective practice that both staff and students are now engaged in. The PD skill is to move them away from assigning ‘marks’ and to get involved in learning. To be able to observe in an online community the pedagogy. Teachers are learning to comment reflectively, and weave the conversation between students. I have developed a set of ‘marking’ guidelines that are matched exactly to the activities that students are now asked to do - daily and weekly. Each of the things students do in the collaborative and individual sense, are mapped to a ‘feedback’ scaffold, which in tern relates to this rubric.

Changing the classroom, is not about new tools to me. I think it would be a ridiculous vision to see kids ‘blogging’ in every room. That would change nothing - apart from maybe delivering new mastery skills.

My approach is to change learning. To change the reflective nature of learning and to provide ways in which teachers can do this without significantly adding to the overhead. If you want to get more than a few adopters in your school, then don’t ask them to ‘learn and use’ a new tool, but show them the how the output of that tool represents learning outcomes. Show them how to scaffold activities such that they are neither too simple (boring) or too complex (frustrating).

This diagram won’t solve the issue, but by starting to change the reflective nature of classroom literacy and focusing on ePortfolio and digital reputation, I am able to allow teachers to maintain their ’style’, but to now focus more on the learning than the content. Staff are now not rushing to spew out content and then ask kids to sumarise electronically.

Reflective Learners who are given interesting activities are engaged learners which in turn leads to teachers having MORE time to observe and support them. The down side - you have to set it up, manage it, support them and the kids, model new methods until such a point that the original ‘norms’ that the teacher and kids want are second nature. Its about changing the very nature of student/teacher interaction and learning processes - not about the ‘tools’ or how many IWB resources you’ve created this week.

Change starts with curriculum and pedagogical approaches - then you can access the thousands of widgets, gadgets and tools (if you know where they are).

August 17, 2008

Chris Harvey

Open source scripts in Second Life

Chris has found a couple of scripts which may be useful to educators and builders in Second Life.

The Linked Prim Animator Lite (LPAL) is a set of open source scripts which enable you to animate linked objects and attachments . LPAL is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation.

Open Babel Fish is an open source babbler, the scripts run on Google Translate and a php script that must be placed on your own web host.

Both scripts can be purchased free from SL exchange. Its really awesome to see such useful tools being released under the terms of the GNU General Public License, so that we can freely modify them to suit our needs and in doing so contribute to the project.

Stephen Downes

What We Learn and How We Learn

Responding to Joanne Jacobs, who writes:
DNA could determine whether children learn from mistakes or cope with abuse, some scientists now believe
Lots to criticize in this report. It doesn't even say who made this 'discovery' and where it was published (telling us that it was an experiment at the Max Planck Institute for Neurological Research in Germany is insufficient).

And the idea that a particular genetic difference will result in a particular behavioral change is a bit suspect. While genetics no doubt influences outcomes, there is a long and complex relationship between them. Brains are plastic, not static, which means that they are not built at birth, but rather, grow from a seed.

But all of that said, let's take these results at face value. Let's suppose that (among other things) children with fewer dopamine receptors are less able to learn from mistakes. Then it would follow that there *are* learning styles, as Howard Gardiner suggested. That, some children - such as these - do not learn as well by doing (trial and error), but rather, by hearing (being told).

Contra people like Willingham it would be the case that the way we learn influences what we can learn. It is not simply the case that there are different kinds of knowledge (linguistic, musical, interpersonal, etc.) but that these are also different ways to learn, that would correspond with these forms of knowledge.

And if this is the case, then it follows that the idea that there is a single way to teach children - and, indeed, a single way to test them - is absurd. Children with fewer dopamine receptors, say, may have the same knowledge as other children - that 'Paris is the capital of France', say - but it would be unreasonable to attempt to teach this knowledge to them in the same way, nor to test them for this knowledge in the same way,

What we learn and how we learn are influenced by a wide range of factors. The child's genetic structure is one of these factors, and rapidly becoming one of the easiest to detect. The nutrition a child receives, pre- and post-natal, is another factor. The child's exposure to varied environments, including the provision of role models and exemplars to follow, is another.

All of these have an impact on what we should teach and how we should teach it. Supposing that any single intervention - small schools, quality teachers, phonics - will resolve an education deficit is absurd and irresponsible.

The only effective intervention is also the most difficult - across the board improvements in a child's social and physical environment (good nutrition, quality experiences, positive social connection) along with personalized learning programs designed address the child's strengths (in both learning domain and learning methodology) where possible and weaknesses where necessary.

August 16, 2008

Jo Kay

Live Futures 2020 - the countdown is on!

It’s 3am AEST, and we’re just about ready for Live Futures 2020! The meeting hall is setup and the speakers are primed.. all we need is an audience!

To join us, TP to the new jokaydia Meeting Hall in Second Life.

Running from 12pm and 6pm AEST on the Islands of jokaydia (7pm SLT, 16 Aug. Check Your Local Time here) join us to hear from a range of great presenters, and also share your ideas for the future!!. You can contribute to the festival in a number of ways:

We’ve also setup a number of tools in Second Life which allow you to explore the Festival content, connect to the contributors and share your views! You can:

  • Add your image to our Avatar Noticeboard
  • Add your comments on our Event Noticeboard
  • Explore the festival online
  • Watch videos inworld
  • Meet other residents and discuss solutions for the future!

Seeyou at the festival!

Graham Wegner

Rethinking Contemporary Teacher PD

What does traditional Professional Development look like? (workshops, conferences, staff meetings, seminars) The features of this approach (which many teachers still view as the only way to update their professional skills and knowledge) seem to be:

  • With an expert
  • A set time, place and duration
  • Handouts with step-by-step instructions
  • Responsibility for learning lies with the facilitator (as in if they are good,” I learnt a lot from that presenter today.”)
  • Everyone in the session experiences the same journey
  • Obtain a solution / formula / approach that can be used tomorrow, a pre-constructed toolbox
    “small picture” solutions or “big picture” gospel
  • Delivered by local “experts” or well known international “gurus”
  • Top down

So, what’s the alternative? What differentiates contemporary professional learning from the traditional? Which new (and not so new) approaches should educators be seeking out? So could this mindset look like this?

  • Anyone or anything is a source of learning
  • You build your own toolbox
  • Equal partnership with others in learning
  • Professional/ Personal Learning Network as a source of professional dialogue
  • Apply inquiry learning principles to oneself as a learner
  • Sharing from but beyond your own classroom
  • Learn by teaching others
  • Small bite-sized snippets “just in time” (video clips, screencasts, mini-tutorials)
  • Continual learning and re-learning (free ranging)
  • Zoom in and out between “small” and “big picture”
  • Learning through networked discovery (as in many ideas / concepts are discovered through connection, rather than strategically planned for)

How’s that look for starters?


Authored by Graham. Hosted by Edublogs.

Two Days With Kath Murdoch

These are my raw notes from my two days working along with my colleagues with inquiry learning exponent, Kath Murdoch, whom I’ve blogged about last year. Any reflections are in italics - anything I write regarding the topic of inquiry tends to viewed through the lense of the challenging ideas and questions posed by Artichoke, from whom I have learnt to be critical about any approach rather than adopting the default gospel approach favoured by many educators. The other thing about these notes are that the Friday sessions were presented for the whole staff (and other schools) so logically would normally be taken in first followed by the Assessment day next - but because it was a smaller, more experienced group attending on the Thursday, the main focus was reversed.

Learner-centred assessment in the inquiring classroom

What can I do to maximise my learning today? Record my thinking so that I can use the main ideas effectively. I also want to seek out some resolutions to the tensions between what I am reading from others and our school’s identified direction.

Can’t do inquiry well without self assessment, can start by setting learning goals at the beginning of a lesson - possible short term goals are set out and the student reflects at the end whether or to what degree their goals have been achieved, kids need lots of practice to self assess.

Short discussion around our table.

Why do we assess students? To “measure” progress, to determine future needs and support, to gain prior knowledge, guide teaching & learning, find out level of understanding, judgement of growth, monitoring students “felt” practice. Ultimate goal of assessment to improve student learning (NZ Curriculum statement)

Looking at student-centred assessment. Summative assessment cannot be the ultimate evaluation, going to need to know what the students have achieved along the way and that summative assessment is just “the icing on the cake”.

Whole group activity ~ joining two halves of mixed up statements together. We then had to find a statement that posed a challenge for us.

Is inquiry learning something we do to students but fail to use for our own learning?

Negotiated curriculum is a two way street – I, as the teacher, hare a say in this as well. We can overdo the student voice angle and the students can see it as only their initiation.

Revisiting the features of an inquiry based classroom

Clear, explicit learning intentions (know, do and be), explicit and co-constructed success criteria, prior learning and subsequent planning,pedagogy that encourages continual ‘revelation’ of thinking and understanding (especially though strategic questioning), formative and summative assessment tasks embedded in units – assessment AS learning.

Self and peer assessment ~ as well as teacher led.

There is a tension between UbD and Inquiry learning. The final assessment task does not need to be “set in concrete” ~ although UbD defines this as an important destination point. Weave in relevant ICT goals into unit planning. What will reasonable evidence of understanding look like?

Many tools can be used along the way. Sorting out our thinking - using the Strongly Agree / Strongly Disagree continuum line. Other methods include diamond ranking (see Kath’s books for more summative tools)

Friday Notes

Teaching and Learning through Inquiry

Broaden and deepen our understanding of inquiry learning, how to teach and plan. Teachers’ responsibility is to create educational environments, “ Teach me how to do it myself.” Challenged us to think of ourselves as learners and set a goal for the day, then identify the strategies / steps to achieve those goals. We want our students to have the skills and strategies to solve a problem.

One tool is a set of cards that outline possible goals for learning for students ~ Students can pull one out of the pack to focus on during the lesson. All children bring experiences to the classroom, what do we do to remove the desire to ask questions? The big turnaround for an inquiry classroom is that the learners ask the questions, not the teacher.

(An example of bad questioning!!)

Examples of Student Questions - Why do dogs have faces? Why do popcorns turn into different shapes? How come your eyes don’t fall out when you bend over?

True inquiry develops around questions. Questions are borne of curiosity. What can I teach my kids about questions? Question out loud in front of your students. At the beginning of an inquiry, use a strategy to establish prior knowledge. Structure task so there has to be some justification of choice.

Knowledge is elastic and flexible - not fixed.

What do we mean by an “integrated approach”?  A sustained learning sequence in which students investigate a rich question/ topic / issue about the physical/social/ personal world, making authentic connections across the curriculum, long or short term, ongoing planning, embedded assessment. You need multiple examples for the students to examine, multiple sources of data to sort, and looking for connections, need to help some kids to “connect the dots” so that they do move from shallow to deep.

I was very interested and pleased to hear a shift in Kath’s thinking from last year and an acknowledgement that the internet has more to offer than a vast unmoderated information mine.


Authored by Graham. Hosted by Edublogs.

Dean Groom

dskmag


Amazing how much this diagram by Jessica Hagy says about Web2.0. Just check the comment channel! I think it should be part of an interview question.

Explain this diagram in 120 characters or less on Twitter.

dskmag


For a very reasonable $7, I signed up for ShoutMix. Its a handy little widget that I’m trying out in a current 9th Grade Learning Community.

Whilst I tried Twitter last year in a 9th grade class, it really didn’t grab their attention. I figure this is a generational thing, as it’s hard to go past MSN Messenger if you are a teenager.

One of the effects of building a Learning Community (this one has 150 plus students), is that they post at home, so we are seeing posts well after the end of the school day.

As we are scaffolding and promoting ‘reflective learning’, we are encouraging them to ask questions and make considered comments.

As we are not about to ask teachers and students to have conversations in MSN Messenger, I wanted to find a way in which we can offer a ‘live’ communication channel.

I know (from a previous life in advertising) that if you want people to come back often to a website, then you have to make it sticky. I think that Shout Mix will add something extra.

I tried Meebo, but I saw that as more of an IM funnel. With ShoutMix’s ’shout board’, I get a number of benefits.

  • A live conversation during class time between students - often students are not in close proximity to each other when working in groups.
  • A micro-twitter channel - in which we can leave messages and links (it auto converts URLS)
  • Out of school communication channel.
  • Comments from people outside school
  • High levels of filtering and archiving of text, user control and moderation.
  • Can be managed online, outside of the Learning Community - even by mobile phone
  • Advertising free.
  • Custom CSS and Embed sizing.

We can use it for group discussion - as we are using a ‘think, pair, share’ classroom activity - Shoutbox can be used to record the output of these discussions - so it can also be used for micro-blogging.

It may of course get pulled if the students go too crazy - but just like teaching them about ‘digital reputation’ when it comes to working online, we are also keen to show them that IM can be used for ‘work’ and not just for social discourse.

If you want to check out the students work and leave a message - then feel free. I’ll post some more on how it goes next week - I am hoping that our work in promoting ethics and digital reputation will on flow into their use of this. I didn’t disable the IM client in Moodle (the LMS), and that hasn’t once raised a concern, so I really hope that staff and students use ShoutMix to do more than chat … micro blogging, micro tweeting … only time will tell.

dskmag


“You are not reaching the standards you should in English, mathematics and science, and this means you are not well prepared for your future adult lives. Some of the teaching you receive is too slow and you spend too much time listening to the teacher instead of practising the skills you are learning, through exciting, purposeful activities.”

According to a recent report in the UK’s Independent newspaper, Ofsted inspectors are sending this in writing to students as young as four. The article claimed,

they may fail in adult life because their teachers are not up to scratch.

Wow, perhaps the system is now so populated by politics, pundits, auditors, ‘consultants’ and policy makers that the underfunded, underpaid teachers have their hands tied. It’s hard not to chalk and talk if that’s all you’ve got to work with!

I worked at a school in the same area with massive socio-economic problems, generational unemployment, behaviour, attendance issues etc., I learned so much from the staff at that school! - as they really were doing amazing things given the ’stuffed’ system they were drowning in!

I also had the pleasure of being Ofsted-ed. Rubbish like this makes me even more in awe of UK teachers that are trying so hard to shift the system. We’ve got it easy!

KerryJ’s Neotenous Tech

Why don’t I feel like bloggin?

So many ideas for great blog posts - so little ambition. From a rant about the LOUD family living next door - to mulling over McD’s new virtual space for kids and the joys of Twittering — I just don’t feel like writing lately. Not sure why, but I’ve decied to try a [...]

Kerrie Smith

Sharing… thinking… Ingesting…

Where do your your new ideas, new tools, new ways of doing things come from?

Many of the new things I learn come from the news items I read, the blogs that I monitor. But every now and again you need to get out into the real world, rub shoulders with educators, and sometimes vendors, to get a new perspective.

So yesterday and today I have been in Melbourne at the National interactive whiteboard conference. I gave a presentation yesterday on using edna to discover resources, and to establish professional support networks. Today my session was on online projects for teachers and students, and my focus was on the need for educators to be constantly accepting new challenges, shifting the goal posts ever so slightly.
Joining an online project, setting one up for your students, or even just becoming part of an online community will mean for most educators that they need to learn/do something new. As someone else has said somewhere I’m sure: to learn you need to move a little outside your comfort zone. 

I’ve not had a lot to do with interactive whiteboards I must admit. Not being in a school, my contact with one is minimal and in the past I’ve been a bit blase in my acceptance of how people have used them. But yesterday and today my eyes have been opened to some fantastic uses. I still have no opinion on which is the best to buy but there can be no doubt about their potential as a teaching tool.

I was a bit worried early yesterday about whether teachers are mistaking entertainment for engagement. But since then I have seen people demonstrate how students might move from engagement to participation to collaboration.  I’ve seen examples of the software that comes with some of the board, how other hardware such as clickers and tablets can be used in conjunction with interactive whiteboards, and then again how existing software can be given a new dimension, a new lease of life, to support collaboration and productivity.

As I said earlier, sometimes you just need to get out….

August 15, 2008

Bill Kerr

what alan kay said about Universals / Non Universals

What Alan Kay said about his Universals / Non Universals slide at the EuroPython 2006 keynote (transcribed by me from source). I've started a new page on the learning evolves wiki whose purpose is to expand and elaborate further on the meanings and educational implications of the list of non universals. Being accurate about what Alan said seemed to be a good place to start.

UNIVERSALS
  • social
  • language
  • communication
  • culture
  • fantasies
  • stories
  • tools and art
  • superstition
  • religion and magic
  • case based learning
  • theatre
  • play and games
  • differences over similarities
  • quick reactions to patterns
  • loud noises and snakes
  • supernormal responses
  • vendetta, and more (about 300 of these have been identified across cultures)
"In effect anthropologists have been studying humans for about a Century now and firstly 3000 human cultures seem to be very very different. Then they start realising that they seemed surprisingly parametric. Every culture had a language, every culture told stories ... (goes through some of the items on the Universals list)

If you look at these you can see our modern internet culture - it's basically social, it enables us to communicate in various ways and so forth, basically a story based culture"

NON UNIVERSALS
  • reading and writing
  • deductive abstract mathematics
  • model based science
  • equal rights
  • democracy
  • perspective drawing
  • theory of harmony
  • similarities over differences
  • slow deep thinking
  • agriculture
  • legal systems
"What's interesting is to look for things that are not universal, that seems to have some importance as well. Most people have lived and died on this Earth for 100,000 years without reading and writing, without having deductive maths and model based science .... (goes through non universals list)

These are a little harder to learn than the ones on the left because we are not directly wired to learn them. These things are actually inventions which are difficult to invent. And the rise of Schools going all the way back to the Sumerian and Egyptian times came about to start helping children learn some of these things that aren't easy to learn. It can be argued that if you are trying to be utopian about education what we should be doing is helping the children of the world learn these hard to learn things. Equal rights is a really good one to help children learn. No culture in the world is particularly good at it."

Dean Groom

dskmag


What do parents think when their kids school really starts delivering on the promise of 21st Century Pedagogy? Not the end result, when they sit the exams, but right here right now. There is a possible issue if we don’t effectively communicate what happened to their work. As parents, we soon learn from primary years, that our kids get homework. We are keen to see them doing it, and keen to help them if we can. That homework used to come in a familiar book. In our school, kids also write their homework in an official diary. Parents are instructed to sign it, so they know that we’re giving them work to do.

This, to parents, is what learning looks like. A physical book, a record and observable activity somewhere between getting home and bed time. If you then start getting kids to work online, then the line becomes really blurred. There is less observable evidence, and therefore parents become concerned that their child is ‘doing less’ and therefore may be ‘learning less’.

Communicating a radical shift in the process we’ve been insisting on for a long time, must lead to some concern. For example : I have a project running with 156 kids all working online in their current project.

This is a massive shift, and we’re working hard to embed reflective, critical literacy inside the project. Writing in a community, reflecting on their learning is a critical 21st century skill, and doing it on this scale poses teachers with a very different pedagogical challenge. How do we co-ordinate feedback ‘visibly’, so that parents can ’see’ what their kids are doing, and how their teachers are supporting this.

One way is to ensure that parents get the URL and get to observe, not just the work, but the collaboration, success, frustration and creativity that as teachers, we see, but couldn’t before give parents a value added shared experience.

Secondly, we encourage teachers to reflect on the week, using the same scaffold that we are modeling to students. It also helps with the comment challenge. If we comment too much, we are overtly interfering with the very ethos of project based learning. If we don’t comment enough, then we are seen as apathetic - doing little more than ticking off the event of posting a journal entry.

I am encouraging, and modeling, the idea of teachers using a weekly post in their page of ‘Ning’. It is an opportunity to show kids that we are learners too, and that we are listening to them. It is also a powerful way to ‘weave’ the learning scaffold - by referencing the work of kids using hyperlinks. Rather than say ‘It been great to see students understanding the project’ - we can hyperlink a few words to a few examples of what we are talking about - so we are evidencing teaching success and student support.

In a class this week I gave an example of how blogging communities give students more opportunity to demonstrate their learning than can be done in our normal mode of operation.

I asked the class a question. Immediately, a dozen hands went up, and kids all started pulling the usual faces to catch my attention - in the hope they would be selected to answer it. So I asked the teacher - “what happens to the other 11 kids, how do they feel at the very moment we make our selection”.

We empower one student and de-motive 11, that seems like a stupid thing to do. But thats how classroom questioning works. But in a classroom blogging community - every kid gets to answer it. Not only that, the kids are asking the questions, and teaching each other.

So I really think that teachers need to consider the effects of moving their classrooms online. Sure the parents like the idea that their kids are online-savvy - but they don’t really know what that means or looks like. Its critical to consider the implications to parent confidence when the ‘books’ and ‘worksheets’ suddenly stop being the normal method of evidencing activity. As kids don’t communicate what they are doing on the computer much of the time, there is a real risk that we loose some degree of confidence.

Giving parents the URL, allowing them to see the work in the community and being able to see what the teacher is thinking about, what they are doing reflectively - significantly changes the communication channels and the relationship that parents have with teachers. I think it is a great move away from the passive nature of parent-teacher relations - but equally some teachers are not going to be too happy about being ‘outed’.

Just an observation following a parent comment this week - “I am not sure he is studying as much as he used to”.

Alexander Hayes

Open Everything : The Rolling Gallop

[ image : sridgway ]

I met Mark Pesce a couple of years back and he had been booted from one job and was courting a thousand others.

He’s right….of course.

How the f…. can we convince huge beaucratic environments to do anything more than lock down learning further and put more roadblocks in place with ICT’s ? Open the doors and maybe using the commercial brilliance of the web some say.

Here’s some more on what he is stirring up here in the land downunder.

Connected, challenging, futurist.

Bill Kerr

how the taboo was broken

Indigenous policy: this is about the historical unfolding of awareness and policy making in Australia in the last 50 years. Twilight of old radicals? by anthropologist Peter Sutton is a must read for those who wish to further their understanding of these issues. There is historical detail here about what unfolded politically in Queensland that I haven't seen before. I have written a summary and included some quotes below for my own benefit but suggest you read the original:
  • Before 1960 the Left supported assimilation as a right offering opportunity to aboriginal people
  • Some Missions were compassionate protectionists and did some good work but were dissolved by the 1970s
  • The new "progressive" consensus was that these communities should be self managed with Land Rights
  • Traditional culture would be encouraged; assimilation was seen as racist
  • This 70s consensus has come undone as welfare dependency and drug abuse in many of these communities has spiraled out of control
  • Queensland Aboriginal activists and administrators have led the way forward to a new analysis
  • Things began to turn around in 1991 with the emergence of indigenous intellectuals such as Noel Pearson and Marcia Langton
  • The old guard activists still held street march demos focused on the symbolic and rights agenda but the leaders workshopped alternative legislation for governments
  • Wayne Goss (Queensland Premier) and Kevin Rudd (then Goss's cabinet office director-general) were far too precious as this unfolded
"In the meantime, the old rights-based progressivism in indigenous political thinking had a few more years to go before a relentless decline in the standard of living and safety of people in Aboriginal communities forced so many of us to ask an appalling question: Why did this descent into a seriously dysfunctional state seem to coincide with liberal progressive policies based on the rights agenda, and the creation of new degrees of community autonomy? The taboo on raising this was finally broken by an avalanche of evidence no one could ignore"
  • Pearson broke the logjam of public discourse about community dysfunction in several hard-hitting papers published in 1999 and 2000
  • print media in the north led the way forward and the southern urban soft Left has lagged behind discovering reality
"The issues now included welfare dependency, community autonomy, organisational corruption, the future of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission, frontier history wars, racially differential morbidity and life expectancy, poor school attendance, declining literacy and numeracy, substance abuse, violence against women, child sexual abuse, customary law as a criminal defence, staying in versus leaving versus orbiting in and out of the ghettos, service mainstreaming, gang warfare and public rioting, the entry permit system and restrictions on media access, the future of funding for remote settlements, and the imminent expectation of rocketing urban migration by Aboriginal people leaving failing outback communities"
  • The taboo on reporting aboriginal dysfunction became broken
  • anthropologist have agonised over whether to report on the distinctive nature of Aboriginal communities or the overwhelming evidence of levels of dysfunction and abuse ...
"We have tended to be protective of the people with whom we have worked, to the point where the recent descent of so many places into dire conditions seems almost scientifically inexplicable"
  • two important factors which have been neglected but must be faced are the social and cultural factors influencing mental health, and the nature of changes in sexual behaviour
"Truth is not necessarily a good uniter of people. Fictions or simplifications so often better bind us, at least for a time"
  • the pieces of this puzzle are in the air, no one yet knows where they will fall

Jo Kay

Live Futures 2020 - This Sunday!

We’ve been planning and scheming this week in the background getting ready for the Live Futures Event which will occur between 12:30pm and 6pm AEST on the Islands of jokaydia! (7pm SLT, 16 Aug. Check Your Local Time here!).

As I’ve previously written - our inworld event is part of the Global Youth Foundation’s real life event - Live Futures 2020: A World of World of Possibility, which is being held at Newtown Square (corner of King St and Enmore Rd opposite Newtown Station).

Our Inworld Program for the day is as follows:

  • 12pm AEST - Welcome and Second Life orientation
  • 12:30pm AEST - Dell Wolfensparger Speaks!
    The fabulous Dell Wolfensparger will share some his work and insights, followed by a tour of his Island in Second Life!
  • 1:30pm - Topophilia - Love of Land: AAEE Gallery Exhibition, Islands of jokaydia
    Birut Zemits and members of the Australian Association for Environmental Education will share their exhibition in Second Life, titled Topophilia - Love of Land
  • 3:00pm AEST - Global Challenges and Sustainable Futures - Cocreation and Collaboration Session
    Janine Cahill and her team will lead an inworld discussion and collaboration session - which will explore some of the issues presented at the real life conference. Help co-create the future!
  • 4:30pm - Dr. Andrew Wallace PhD, Director of the Network of European Technocrats
    Dr Wallace will give a presentation titled Technocracy: Building a New Sustainable Society for a Post Carbon World live in Second Life.

There will also be lots of opportunities to share your thoughts about sustainability, technology and the future, visit interesting spaces in Second Life and meet the residents of the Islands of jokaydia! We’ll also be sharing links, videos, ideas and images from the festival throughout the day!

To join us simply TP to the Islands of jokaydia Meeting Hall (SLurl)

For those who are interested in attending the real-life festival in Newtown, click here to view the program!

August 14, 2008

Dean Groom

dskmag


Thanks Rebecca! Love your work!

Graham Wegner

Why My Colleagues Think I’m Weird

I’ve been reading some of Dean Groom’s stuff and spending a lot of time nodding and mentally saying “Uh huh.” His thoughts and much of what I encounter from others in similar roles in their online writing makes me feel less isolated and less inclined to label myself as the “weirdo” or “oddball” out of step with reality.

But I just know that more than a few of my colleagues are convinced that I am not normal and that this over-obsession with all things digital is a good starting point for proof.

Here’s some more evidence fuelling their opinion:

  • He says he doesn’t watch much TV or even read daily newspapers.
  • He walks around with strange gadgets - over gigabyted USB drives, recording devices, PDAs, heck even my school laptop is some strange tablet PC contraption.
  • He seems to work things out for himself by playing with technology (Won’t he break something? Doesn’t he need instructions? Shouldn’t he be doing real work?)
  • He uses weird words like blog, wiki, twitter, network, skype, slideshare, unconference - does any normal person know what he’s on about?
  • He volunteers to speak and present at conferences (as if he has worthwhile to say) but says he gets bored sitting in the audience at them.
  • He’s even Googled his own name!
  • He interacts with weird strangers online and then he goes to meet them. Hasn’t he heard of stranger danger?
  • And he gets frustrated that we aren’t all as interested obsessed as he is about this whole internet thing - says that we’ll all be irrelevant or something if we don’t get involved.

Just like this Dean Groom fella, my colleagues probably figure that this would be my point of view as well.

But herein lies the problem. We want them to use it, so access is made easy. PD is offered, but suffers from the power distribution law syndrome where a few, do most, most of the time. Teachers know that they can set some task - say a video - but don’t need to ‘learn’ to use it personally - they don’t go through the student experience - so a guessing at the value of the activity at best. They assume that the ‘digital natives’ will just get on with it - else the IT people or computing staff will be the ‘go to’ people for the students. We accept this, and of course help the kids as we figure at least the kids are using technology.

And they’d probably be right. Maybe I am wrong. This internet obsession thing might all be a lot of hot air and I’m wasting my time right now.

But that means so are you.


Authored by Graham. Hosted by Edublogs.

Bill Kerr

question 22

walter bender's question 22:
(22) What “shoulders of giants” should we stand on? What is it that children should learn? Are there any universals? How do children decide whom and what to believe?
I've been providing what I think is a good answer to these questions for some time now (since December 2006: what should schools teach?) but often the response is muted and contradictory. It's not my original answer, it originates from alan kay and his analysis originates from anthropologists.

The answer is not that children should learn the universals but what Kay has called the "non universals". From anthropological research of over 3000 human cultures, Kay presented two lists, the first were universals, the things that all human cultures have in common. This list included things like:
  • language
  • communication
  • fantasies
  • stories
  • tools and art
  • superstition
  • religion and magic
  • play and games
  • differences over similarities
  • quick reactions to patterns
  • vendetta, and more
He then presented a list of non universals, the things that humans find harder to learn. This list was shorter and included:
  • reading and writing
  • deductive abstract mathematics
  • model based science
  • equal rights
  • democracy
  • perspective drawing
  • theory of harmony
  • similarities over differences
  • slow deep thinking
  • agriculture
  • legal systems
The non universals have not arisen spontaneously, they have been discovered by the smartest humans after hundreds or thousands of years of civilisation. Hence, it follows that children need guidance in learning them, they will not be discovered by open ended discovery learning. There is an objective need for some version of “school” - where advanced knowledge is somehow communicated from those who know it to those who don't.

The resolution of the tension (between how children learn and the complex, non spontaneous nature of the development of advanced scientific or Enlightenment ideas) is to develop an honest children's version of the advanced ideas. For some of these ideas (not all) the computer can aid this process. Which ones? The list would include the laws of motion, turtle geometry, calculus by vectors, exponential growth, feedback and system ecologies. I think this should be the starting point or at least one of the starting points for thinking about how computers should be used in schools.

Part of the discussion here is establishing that computers are not currently used to their full potential in schools. IMO once the above vision of how computers could be used in schools is understood then it becomes obvious that they are currently poorly used in schools.

I've been wondering why this particular idea, the non universals, is not spreading more. I think it's because it goes against the culture of pseudo progressiveness which advocates that process is more important than content, that discovery is more important than knowledge and/